I was discussing the impact of exhibitions that have have excellent content, even to the point of challenging some pre-conceived ideas, that are not really visited by anyone.  This discussion was with the director of a German museum who, through an exhibition I had at my gallery this year, came to see the show and invited me to visit him thereafter.

The general gist of the conversation was that there are populist exhibitions which will draw crowds, possibly generate sales and generally will be seen as immediately successful.  There are also exhibitions which are not this way because they represent an aspect of an artist or topic which has not yet moved into the general understanding and as such require time before they develop their impact.  That is where the term “Time Bomb” came into play.

I think about this often.  Indeed I have had many conversation before, and even more after this meeting about this topic.  My father Gerd, who ran the Sander Gallery in Wqashington DC and New York City before he founded the August Sander Archive often said to me that a gallery is not a place to sell pictures, rather it is a place to formulate a point of view.  I would love to agree with this whole heartedly, but there is an aspect of reality that requires that I actually sell pictures.  No sales, no money. No money, no food, etc…  But aside from this existential reality, I really do agree with my dad.  When I think back on exhibitions that have moved me I cannot think of one that was based on selling pictures.  They were always based on the work, the artist and the meaning interpreted by the curator (yes, this is another topic for another day).

The shows that were also successful showed work that was close enough to the popular stream of consciousness that the buyers could embrace it without having to step too far away from their own safety area.

Back to the Sander Gallery, and the work it showed. A friend of my father and mine, and a fellow gallerist from New York City named Howard said that my father was always 10-20 years ahead of his time.  Good if your buying, difficult if your showing or selling.  A mixed blessing if you are growing up with it.

So here I am with the aforementioned mixed blessing.  And a series of time bombs.  I guess I do believe that a gallery is a place to define a point of view.  There is no other place where I can freely show examples of how I see the arts, and how I envision them being combined.  The views I present are, by nature, very personal.  They must be.  If they were not then I would be showing a consensus which is certainly very far from being a singular viewpoint. And while I do this I gain fans and collectors who respect my view and are willing to enter a discussion with me about the work shown.  Some prove me right, some prove me wrong, but we all are the richer and more blessed for it.

So, I guess it isn’t a mixed blessing after all. Just a series of time bombs.

•  
• 
• Share on Tumblr